From the Cheap Seats: Dems Shoot Themselves in Foot with Gun Control Rollout

February 8, 2013
By

Gun control has been at the top of the leadership’s to-do list since before the legislature convened

Colorado Democrats have allegedly been working on gun-control legislation for months, but this week’s unveiling of a proposed eight-bill package on firearms appeared to have been thrown together in about 10 minutes.

For one, there were no bills introduced at Tuesday’s press conference, only descriptions of bills. Senate President John Morse and House Speaker Mark Ferrandino explained that the bills would be dropped soon, some as early as this week.

“You’d think that if they were going to have a big presser, they’d have the bills ready,” observed House Minority Leader Mark Waller.

The lack of actual language gave the announcement a slap-dash feel, as if Democrats were under pressure to make an announcement, any announcement.

And that’s probably true, given that gun control has been at the top of the leadership’s to-do list since before the legislature convened five weeks ago and the party faithful were getting restless.

The other stunner was Morse’s proposed bill on strict liability for manufacturers, distributors, sellers and buyers of semi-automatic weapons. The gun-control lobby undoubtedly saw the idea as ingenious: Ban so-called assault weapons without actually saying that you’re banning assault weapons by making it possible to sue everyone connected with such firearms.

As state Sen. Greg Brophy (R-Wray) put it, the concept is akin to being able to sue Coors for accidents caused by drunk drivers.

There’s just one problem: a federal law, the 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, prohibits such lawsuits. As everyone familiar with the concept of federalism was quick to point out, the federal act would preempt any bill passed by the Colorado legislature.

Refusing to admit defeat, Morse seems to think that if enough people get behind his bill, er, proposed bill, a national grassroots groundswell will overwhelm Congress and convince members to overturn the federal act.

Hmm. Probably not going to happen. Even The Denver Post editorial board described Morse’s idea as “fantasy” and “wishful thinking.”

National Rifle Association president David Keene, who met Thursday with Gov. John Hickenlooper, Morse and Ferrandino, called the proposal “a feel-good measure that’s probably not going to do any good, and I think it also runs into problems with federal preemption.”

Last time we checked, Colorado Democrats were flush with campaign cash, outspending their Republican foes by huge margins. Note to Democrats: It may be time to pull some of that funding out of the campaign and invest in a good lawyer, preferably one who’s familiar with the laws already on the books.

Democrats clearly have their hands full with trying to pass gun-control legislation. It’s got to balance the desires of liberal urban Democrats and moderate rural Democrats, as well as the interests of the risk-averse Democratic governor. That’s a lot of balancing. It remains to be seen if the Democratic leadership can pull it off. This week’s gun-control mess wasn’t a good sign.

Comments made by visitors are not representative of The Colorado Observer staff.

One Response to From the Cheap Seats: Dems Shoot Themselves in Foot with Gun Control Rollout

  1. curtis41
    February 8, 2013 at 3:00 pm

    A few observations: It is silly to hold a gun manufacturer for things done with his or her legal product being sold. Second, the training requirement being suggested is ludicrous. A blind man or an 85 year old woman have a right to a gun in their home. There is no age, sex, race or zip code requirement for constitutional rights. Training is silly and should not be a condition of getting or bearing a gun. Second, things being suggested in legislation are more a states rights, or sovereignty issue in the first place. Assault bans and magazine restrictions to 10-shots will not work. There are millions of each in common, legal use at present. How about enforcing gun laws on felons doing gun crimes, lying on their application for a new firearm or getting one from a straw sale? A mental patient register is fine, but do NOT put all the veterans with PTSD in it unless they have been proven dangerous to themselves and/or others. Plan on government to mess that up too. My sense is we have the most anti-gun folks on earth like Feinstein and Pelosi, et al. crafting gun laws, when their agenda is clearly to disarm all Americans, save for police, military and secret service for you know who and his children at school. Trading effective self-defense, constitutional rights and personal freedom for leftists ideas under the guise of public safety is never a good trade in a free, open, constitutional republic. Most of this gun control legislation is more about governmental control than public safety, and the legislation should not see the light of day.

Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Complete Colorado
Colorado Peak Politics - Sometimes Unruly. Always Conservative.

Visitor Poll

Should illegal immigrant kids flooding the border be housed in Colorado?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

The Colorado Observer