ANALYSIS: Udall and Bennet Blink on Gun Control

April 19, 2013
By

Bennet and Udall’s decision to buck their party on a key gun control vote is bad news for state Democrats

Colorado Sens. Michael Bennet and Mark Udall’s votes against a federal assault weapons ban Wednesday should send a cold chill down the spine of every Democratic state legislator.

When it comes to firearms, neither Bennet nor Udall will ever be confused with Chuck Norris. Both are liberal Democrats who said earlier this year that they would support federal gun-control legislation.

Their about-face shows that they were paying attention to the popular uprising now rocking Colorado in reaction to the Democratic Party’s decision to ram a package of sweeping gun-control bills through the state legislature despite intense public opposition.

That Bennet and Udall were willing to buck their party, including the White House, on President Obama’s top 2013 legislative priority is the strongest sign yet that state Democrats just made a huge mistake.

Bennet and Udall sit atop of the Colorado Democratic Party’s food chain. Neither is seen as particularly vulnerable: Bennet won a tough election fight in 2010, but he doesn’t face the voters again until 2016. He’s also fabulously wealthy, meaning he can afford to offend gun-control and gun-rights backers alike.

Udall comes up for reelection in 2014, but he’s also the party’s golden boy, coasting to reelection during his House years without breaking a sweat. Republicans, who still don’t know who they’re going to run against him, have yet to really lay a glove on him.

In other words, they don’t exactly inhabit the same political universe as guys like state Rep. Mike McLachlan (D-Durango), who won his swing seat in November by less than 1,000 votes.

McLachlan is now one of a dozen Democrats in political hot water for voting in favor of the gun-control bills. Angry gun owners in his district are gathering signatures to force a recall election, but even if he survives a recall, his prospects for a second term aren’t looking especially promising.

The same goes for state Sens. Angela Giron (D-Pueblo), Evie Hudak (D-Lakewood) and John Morse (D-Colorado Springs).

As everyone knows, gun-rights advocates mounted an enormous grassroots battle against the state’s legislative gun-control package. They turned out by the thousands for committee hearings, floor debates, rallies and protests. They flooded their Democratic representatives with emails. Most of the time, they were ignored.

Or so they thought.

While Democrats in Denver were assiduously sticking to their gun-control game plan, it turns out those in Washington were watching the drama unfold at the state capitol. Those hours spent waiting to testify before a committee, those days taken off work, those nights drawing up signs and calling friends–they may have made the difference in convincing the Senate to reject federal gun-control legislation.

It’s unfortunate that gun-control advocates couldn’t get their own state representatives to listen. But Cheap Seats thinks they may be listening now.

Comments made by visitors are not representative of The Colorado Observer staff.

5 Responses to ANALYSIS: Udall and Bennet Blink on Gun Control

  1. wrongheifer
    April 19, 2013 at 12:31 pm

    I understand there is a bill pending to protect illegal voters…allowing same day registration unverifiable…FRAUD magnet!
    I understand while you’re taking our RIGHTS…you are telling us we are safer…your next bill is reducing sentences and penalties for crimes! Trust?

    I’ll never Trust another Democrat as long as I live!

    • Joanb
      April 21, 2013 at 8:53 pm

      The only reason for this travesty is to promote fraud and to get more democratic votes. Instead of our social security numbers when we file taxes, lets just get a utility bill out
      of a dumpster for our ID and see how that works! Works for the dems in the Co. legislature. Colorado has been made a laughing stock this legislative session. And , the democrats still have three weeks (and they’re working overtime) to shove liberal crap down our throats. Colorado screwed!!!!

  2. Joanb
    April 21, 2013 at 8:48 pm

    Please check, but I’m pretty sure both of them voted to give the UN the power to take guns. Fortunately, that was voted down. Worthless.

  3. Tim Haley
    April 27, 2013 at 8:34 am

    I think both should be commended in making the right choice. I do not personally own an assault weapon, not have I ever fired one. But I do know some people who derive a lot of pleasure from shooting “assault” weapons. Hunters use them. The differences between an assault weapon and a normal semi-automatic weapon are cosmetic.
    We seem to be going after gun safety with the same ill-advised strategy we used on the war on drugs. We blame the item and the producers instead of the users. Maybe we should go after providing mental health support.
    I was on a high school rifle team. We were not a military school and competed against many public schools. The riflery program de-romanticized guns and we learned gun safety. Perhaps we would have less problem with guns if riflery were back in schools. It is counter-intuitive, but true, the more guns in a community the less gun violence.

  4. Mike Sylvan
    May 2, 2013 at 8:36 pm

    Udall and Bennet let us down. How much gun violence will it take before they do the right thing and vote for this bill.

Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Complete Colorado
Colorado Peak Politics - Sometimes Unruly. Always Conservative.

Visitor Poll

Should illegal immigrant kids flooding the border be housed in Colorado?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

The Colorado Observer