Guest Commentary: Time to Close Prison Loopholes

May 20, 2013
By
McNULTY:  By allowing early release loopholes to remain open, Democrats are gambling with public safety

McNULTY: By allowing early release loopholes to remain open, Democrats are gambling with public safety

There is no way to reconcile the murder of Colorado’s prison chief Tom Clements.  A prison reformer who came to Colorado from Missouri, Mr. Clements pushed for prison programs aimed at helping inmates reintegrate into society — an important view and mission for anyone responsible for protecting the public from criminals and their harmful behavior.

Because of Mr. Clements tragic murder, Colorado has started a comprehensive and thorough review of the systemic failures that lead to the early release of Mr. Clements murderer, Evan Ebel, and how those systemic failures can be best addressed.

Corrections officials have initiated a series of internal reviews within our state prison system, and have worked with our courts to do the same.  This will, in fairness, take time given that there are tens of thousands of computer files and pieces of paperwork to analyze.

There are, however, two very clear systemic failures that have already been identified and could be quickly fixed.  Or rather, could have been quickly fixed.

You see, the annual legislative session has ended, and the Colorado General Assembly has adjourned for the year.  The end of the General Assembly’s 120-day session also brought an end, at least for this year, any opportunity to fix those public safety issues already identified as a result of the investigation into Ebel’s accidental early release.

As we now know, Ebel, who is also suspected of killing pizza delivery man Nathan Leon, was released four years early do to a clerical error in the “mittimus” (the order from a judge that tells prison officials the length of time a criminal is to spend behind bars).

In this case, the judge called for Ebel to serve an additional four year sentence due to an assault Ebel committed while in prison.  But the order received by corrections officials did not reflect that the additional four years be served on the back end of Ebel’s the original sentence.

Because of Colorado case law, sentences are served at the same time unless it is clearly delineated in the order to commit that the sentences be served one after the other.  So because of human error, Ebel was released four years early.

Noting the inherent public safety risk associated with the way sentences are currently handled, I asked Democratic leadership in the House for a “late bill” to fix this problem – and prevent the next Evan Ebel from wrongly being released on to Colorado’s streets.  Any legislative issue that arises after the final bill deadline requires a “late bill” from the House Leadership.  Democrats are in charge of the House and they are the ones who must agree to allow a late bill to be introduced and considered.  I was granted a late bill along with Rep. Claire Levy (D-Boulder) to address this issue of concurrent vs. consecutive sentencing.  Because of the law we passed, I believe that this particular systemic failure has been addressed sufficiently.

But another glaring deficiency that came to light as a result of this investigation relates to “earned time” or for prison inmates.  This loophole was not fixed.

Under current law, inmates can “earn” fewer days in jail if they participate in programs designed to rehabilitate their criminal behavior.  Ebel was one of those inmates who earned time off even though he quit or had been kicked out of the rehabilitation programs that he signed up for.

State corrections officials say they don’t have the ability to revoke earned time if the inmate doesn’t finish a program or acts out by assaulting or killing another inmate a prison guard. To fix this, lawmakers could easily provide corrections this authority or clarify existing authority with a simple bill like we passed to clarify the issue of concurrent vs. consecutive sentencing.

I asked Democratic leadership for a late bill to make sure that violent criminals are not able to keep their earned time, especially if they are clearly not ready to be safely released into our neighborhoods.

Democrats said no.

By allowing this gaping loophole to remain open, Democrats are gambling with the safety of our families and our communities.  They are continuing a dangerous practice to remain in place, a dangerous practice that allows violent criminals to leave prison early, putting everyone at risk.

And that’s something all Coloradans should be concerned about.

Rep. Frank McNulty was Speaker of the Colorado House for the 68th General Assembly.  He represents Highlands Ranch, Colorado.

Comments made by visitors are not representative of The Colorado Observer staff.

2 Responses to Guest Commentary: Time to Close Prison Loopholes

  1. Claire Levy
    May 21, 2013 at 9:41 am

    There is one inaccuracy in Frank McNulty’s column. The Democrats did not say no to a bill that would have fixed the problem of not being able to revoke earned time. In fact, the Democrats said yes to his proposal. I had such a bill drafted and was working on the language. I was going to have Frank “co-prime” the bill with me. We realized after looking into what happened that the laws governing earned time are confusing and conflicting, so it wasn’t a simple fix. We also learned that the Department of Corrections had reasons related to offender management for doing what they did. Rather than rush something through when we didn’t have time to make sure we weren’t creating unintended consequences, we decided it would be better to thoroughly understand DOC’s policies and the background of existing laws. Doing something just to do something often leads to a bad result.

    • Bob Terry
      August 17, 2013 at 2:29 pm

      Thank you Claire … I like the last statement “Doing something just to do something often leads to a bad result”

      Well le’ts see not only look at this …but what the Democrats have done …this past session … We have had one say ….We had to do something …..really because it made the party feel good The people are seeing we’re making change really ? ..like it was gonna radically change something …Ramrodding agendas through because “We’re and You’re gonna like it you’ll feel good and we feel good ( gag) regardless …

      God save us your so California and Tax this and ban that…get original make a difference… I’m tired of paying for garbage legislation and YOUR outcome…Colorado is now BAD GOVERNMENT at the detriment of “us” who live here

      This State Legislature flits to and fro like a hummingbird…What about energy and Gas and Coal …No lets suck the teat of the Enviro’s…Hey now there’s Uncle Barrack our president …he doesn’t care …Now we’re on trash bags and grocery bags ..Guns BAD bad I’ll tell ya what 99% of you need to go away Colorado needs to start over …

Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Complete Colorado
Colorado Peak Politics - Sometimes Unruly. Always Conservative.

Visitor Poll

Should illegal immigrant kids flooding the border be housed in Colorado?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

The Colorado Observer