Udall Firefighting Efforts Backfire

June 14, 2013
By
Some of Sen. Mark Udall's efforts to help fight forest fires have backfired

Some of Sen. Mark Udall’s efforts to help fight forest fires have backfired

WASHINGTON — Several attempts by Sen. Mark Udall to help Colorado fight forest fires have backfired, including his effort to acquire funding the state already received and his insistence on using retired military aircraft that critics say are not suited for battling blazes.

Udall is pressuring the Forest Service to take 14 soon-to-be retired C-27J Spartans off the Air Force’s hands to create its own fleet to drop fire retardant on forest fires.

The Colorado Democrat says the Forest Service can modernize the C-27Js at no cost to the taxpayer, but critics say it will cost millions and take several years to retrofit the Italian-made turboprop-powered cargo planes, that have never been used to fight forest fires.

Tom Eversole, executive director of the American Helicopter Services and Aerial Firefighting Association, said there is no tank in existence to fit the plane for slurry transport. It would cost at least $5 million to design and equip each plane, he estimated.

“The Air Force, they don’t want to fly them anymore for various reasons, so they are basically sending them to the bone yard,” Eversole said.

“My argument to Udall was, if they gave you those airplanes tomorrow they are not going to be flying on a fire in Colorado for three to five years,” Eversole said.

“He can make all the noises he wants, but if you want aircraft on the fires this year the companies are prepared to do that, and they don’t have to wait for Air Force airplanes that may never get transferred,” Eversole said.

Complicating matters, the small size of the C-27J Spartans dictates that only tanks with a capacity to carry 1,800 gallons of slurry can be installed. The Forest Service recently mandated in its modernization program that all of its contractors update their fleet with tanks that can carry 3,000-gallon tanks costing the companies millions of dollars to get planes ready by this summer.

“It’s a bad precedent,” Eversole said.

The Forest Service plans to contract with five companies to provide aerial firefighting measures, but because of the new modernization requirements only one plane is ready for use.

“I’ve been on your doorstep about the next generation contracts … I will also be on the doorstep of the Air Force if this doesn’t happen as quickly as it needs to happen. I want you to know we’ve got to get this done,” Udall told the Forest Service last week during a Senate hearing.

“What I hear you saying is you want to fight 21st Century fires with 21st Century aircraft,” Udall said. “We’re fighting 21st Century fires with Korean War era aircraft we need the next generation aircraft at our disposal and we need these C-27Js at our disposal.”

In addition to the $70 million tank costs, the Forest Service plans to contract out for pilots to operate their retrofitted fleet and taxpayers will have to foot the bill for costly repairs and maintenance.

“The Forest Service says they are free, but they’re not free,” Eversole said. “If the Air Force can’t afford to operate these things, what makes you think the Forest Service can?”

Meanwhile, Tom Harbour, national director of fire aviation management for the Forest Service, told the Missoulian newspaper that until the C-27Js are retrofitted to fight fires, they would use the aircraft to transport fire jumpers.

Fires blazing through Colorado this week are already to blame for two deaths, the destruction of 400 homes, and tens of thousands of acres burned.

Ironically, one of the first planes to come to the state’s aid was the P2V, a Korean-era, and forest fire tested aircraft operated by Neptune Aviation.

Udall saw another proposal of his go down in flames this week when the Senate refused to even consider his amendment to the farm bill declaring forest fires a natural disaster on par with floods, hurricanes and tornadoes, in order to give the state access to disaster aid through the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

That’s because the president already has that power to declare forest fires a disaster area, the trigger for releasing federal tax dollars to rebuild structures and infrastructure, and gave Colorado $19 million in aid for last summer’s widespread destruction.

“If your house gets burnt up in a fire and the president declares it a disaster area, you are eligible for the same kind of FEMA help that you would be if it were a hurricane,” said Mark Rey, the Agriculture Department undersecretary for natural resources and environment for President George W. Bush.

Udall was also banking on FEMA funds to offset a 37 percent cut proposed by the Obama administration for fuel reduction projects next year to prevent forest fires.

“My amendment also ensures that Colorado receives FEMA support to mitigate wildfire risks and address the damage wildfires do,” Udall said in announcing his measure.

“Colorado experienced two of its most devastating wildfires in recent memory last year. My amendment helps ensure that mitigation dollars will be available to proactively reduce risk and help protect Colorado communities from catastrophic wildfire and post-fire flooding,” Udall said.

Rey suggested Udall’s legislative priorities were misplaced, and predicted Congress would reject the lawmaker’s measure.

Instead of creating a new fire prevention bureaucracy in the Homeland Security Department that duplicates existing programs at the Interior Department and Forest Service, Udall should have been lobbying the Obama administration to fund the existing programs, Rey said.

Comments made by visitors are not representative of The Colorado Observer staff.

2 Responses to Udall Firefighting Efforts Backfire

  1. Bob Terry
    June 18, 2013 at 8:41 am

    The wildfires were tragic..no question there. But this is a Grandstander grabbing the moment..Doing something for the unwashed. Ever wonder why planes are sent to a airplane boneyard, because they are either totally worn out or the cost to maintain outweighs its usefullness. I am sure this is a gesture of goodwill, but like most “elite” politicians, they have no clue on how the real world works. This won’t cost the taxpayer…yeah right…it would find its way to us, in some form or another. Colorado anymore is like a rudderless ship. But there is something that will SAVE one thing in order to justify it..Yeah justify emptying our wallets… Talk about something not maintained our forestland. Overgrown and ripe for disaster, but our Democrats ply the enviro’s and it costs in the end… Dead and dying trees allowed to stack up and Bonfire City, when they catch fire…Unfortunately this took place in a southern metro area…but its becoming too common.

  2. July 30, 2013 at 4:06 pm

    I am very troubled by well intentioned individuals, especially politicians, that throw out ideas like this but are totally clueless as to the realities of how to get this done. Perhaps that is why most politicians seem inept. They don’t do their homework and they throw out soundbites that sound good but have no basis in fact. Such is the case for the transfer of the C-27 to the USFS. There is no Modular Airborne Fire Fighting System that fits in the c-27. There are no USFS crews to fly them, maintain them, no operations or maintenance facilities to support them, and we are to believe “missionizing” these aircraft to do this mission for the USFS will cost the taxpayer nothing?? Your heart is in the right place for wanting to do something but I think I know where your brain is for thinking this could be effective and at no cost to the taxpayer.

Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Complete Colorado
Colorado Peak Politics - Sometimes Unruly. Always Conservative.

Visitor Poll

Should illegal immigrant kids flooding the border be housed in Colorado?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

The Colorado Observer