Tipton Bill Seeks to Stop Feds from Trampling Water Rights

October 11, 2013
Tipton's legislation would uphold state water laws and protect against federal water grabs

Tipton’s legislation would uphold state laws and protect against federal water grabs

WASHINGTON – Colorado ski industry officials told House lawmakers on Thursday that congressional intervention is needed to block a water extortion scheme by the Forest Service to withhold government permits unless the companies relinquish their valuable water rights.

“Without the water, we’re not in business,” David Corbin, vice president of the Aspen Skiing Company told the House Natural Resources subcommittee on water and power.

The hearing focused on the Water Rights Protection Act authored by Colorado Republican Rep. Scott Tipton, which would uphold state water laws and block what he described as a nefarious federal water grab of privately held water rights.

“This legislation provides critical protection for water rights’ holders from federal takings by ensuring that federal government agencies cannot extort private property rights through uneven-handed negotiations,” Tipton said.

“To this end, the brief two page bill prohibits federal agencies from pilfering water rights through the use of permits, leases, and other land management arrangements, for which it would otherwise have to pay just compensation under the 5th Amendment of the Constitution,” Tipton said.

Corbin told the panel that the Aspen ski company spends $2 million to use 250 million gallons of water every season to make snow, and that it is essential to operations during the lucrative season opening around the winter holidays, as well as in early spring.

“We very much think this is a taking,” Corbin said.

Despite a court ruling in favor of the ski companies last year that seizing the privately held water rights usurped state water law, the Forest Service is pursing a new regulation to demand that water rights be transferred to the federal government as a condition for obtaining permits needed to operate 121 ski resorts that cross over federal lands.

Republican lawmakers said the Forest Service has essentially declared a war on western water rights.

“This action illustrates an increasingly hostile attitude by this agency toward those who make productive use of our vast national forests, in this case by enhancing and attracting the tourism upon which our mountain communities depend,” said Rep. Tom McClintock, California Republican and the panel’s chairman.

McClintock said he has also received reports that the federal government is using similar tactics to seize water rights from ranching operations in exchange for grazing permits.

Glenn Porzak, a lawyer representing ski areas in Colorado and California, as well as the water district and authority that serves 60,000 customers from Vail to Wolcott, said hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent to develop water rights and enhance operations.

“If the federal government is just going to take it away, you take away the incentive for investment,” Porzak said.

Asked by Tipton why the Obama administration is so anxious to control water rights, which are rarely sold to downstream users, Porzak said “It’s (for) control over a resource that’s indispensible and enormously valuable.”

“They want to have control to decide how that water is allocated and used,” Porzak said.

Democrats complained that Republicans held the hearing without representatives from the Forest Service, an absence they further blamed on the government shutdown.

However, McClintock said Forest Service officials informed the committee prior to the shutdown they would not attend the hearing or comment on Tipton’s bill until the agency made a final decision as to whether it will demand water ownership in exchange for use permits.

Rep. Jarod Huffman, California Democrat, said the panel and lawmakers had “unfairly vilified” the Forest Service and that the ski companies should cooperate with the federal officials.

“Why does everything have to be so adversarial,” Huffman said. “Why not just negotiate?”

Corbin said the ski industry has offered compromises, but the Forest Service rejected the proposals.

Comments made by visitors are not representative of The Colorado Observer staff.

One Response to Tipton Bill Seeks to Stop Feds from Trampling Water Rights

  1. Bob Terry
    October 11, 2013 at 1:09 pm

    Democrats are always complaining …Okay they the Dems in the Senate and Barrack, are just as responsible..but will pick and choose who stays open or enforces policy. Okay well looks like the Parks Department Fish and Game Forest Service…yeah buddy they are out there like the lil Government militia keeping us riff raff ( taxpayers out and at bay ) Well republicans..say shut down or not…get yer butts in here and explain your position. But no can’t hurt feelings..and they may have to pay for something..and it may hurt the Administration…so much Horseshit ( yeah that is shut down too due to the shut down ) It will come to the point the citizens of the US will just say screw ya..when ya hit the pocket book…Obama will squeal like a pig..as well as our democrats here in Colorado. We pay for federal lands and park and such…but now it belongs to Obama…really who made him King…Tell me we’re getting our money’s worth with this US Government…Democrat republican or otherwise… we are not . Like to see how much hell to pay would come about if the Ski Areas were shutdown..and not only here in Colorado. Where are our great Sentaors, the dynamic duo, Udi n Benny yeah right enough said


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Complete Colorado
Colorado Peak Politics - Sometimes Unruly. Always Conservative.

Visitor Poll

Should illegal immigrant kids flooding the border be housed in Colorado?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

The Colorado Observer