REPORT: Feds Should Use Limited Resources to Maintain Existing Lands

November 6, 2013
The top ten visited National Parks have a $2.6 billion maintenance backlog, yet resources were spent on items such as wine trains, Elvis boats, neon sign restoration, inflatable fair rides and video game production

The top ten visited parks have a $2.6 billion maintenance backlog, yet resources were spent on wine trains, Elvis boats, inflatable fair rides and video games

WASHINGTON — A Senate report released this week says the National Park Service needs to take care of the property already in its inventory and suggested that members of Congress take a break from adding new properties to the financially struggling system.

“Instead of proposing new national parks on the moon, Congress should be focused on restoring our decaying national treasures right here on earth,” said Sen. Tom Coburn, Oklahoma Republican and the report’s author.

“Long before the government shutdown and sequestration, our parks had become a physical manifestation of Congress’ dysfunction,” Coburn said.

The report, “How Congress’ Misplaced Priorities are Trashing Our National Treasures,” blames Washington politicians for using the park service to advance their parochial interests instead of maintaining the national properties, and outlines numerous instances of wasteful spending.

For example, the top ten most visited parks last year had a $2.6 billion maintenance backlog, while limited resources were instead spent on items such as wine trains, Elvis boats, neon sign restoration, teachers’ symposiums, car shows, DC area-concert subsidies, folk festivals, inflatable fair rides and video game production, the report said.

Meanwhile, Congress spends nearly $530 million every year to purchase more private land to add to the National Park Service’s holding.

Former Interior Secretary Gale Norton was in Washington this week for meetings of the Conservation Leadership Council, and told The Colorado Observer afterwards that most of the parks proposed for national designation would be more suitable for city or state parks.

“There is a tendency to designate places as national parks that don’t really merit that designation,” Norton said.

“The crown jewels really are already in the National Park Service and ought to be managed as the priorities that they deserve,” Norton said.

The national park system was originally created with 35 park unit, but has expanded to more than 400 parks that cover more than 84 million acres.

In July, two Democrats introduced legislation to claim property on the moon as a national lunar park.

If acquired, the moon artifacts would join more than 121,000 museum objects already preserved by the park agency.

The National Park Service was heavily criticized last month after shuttering the entire system during the partial government shut down, erecting new barricades at numerous sites and deploying armed guards at others to block taxpayers from entering the public lands.

Norton said the agency was “over-enthusiastic” in its response, and that some of the parks could have easily remained open including Colorado’s Rocky Mountain National Park.

“Clearly, there are historic treasures, museums and buildings that need to have supervision in order to allow the public to enter,” Norton said. “Shutting down the government requires shutting down those kinds of facilities.”

“But when I was a kid, I used to visit Rocky Mountain National Park in the winter with my family. You would never see a ranger, you would never see anybody out there regulating people’s use of  (the park) — people were able to enjoy it and I think there are a lot of places where they could have allowed the public to enjoy the national parks and not artificially cut back on public access,” Norton said.

“I heard there were some places where they had more people guarding to prevent the public from getting into areas than they ordinarily would have had to manage the areas,” Norton said.

House Republicans are investigating the system-wide closure, and pushing legislation to repay states like Colorado that gave the federal government a check to reopen key parks.

Comments made by visitors are not representative of The Colorado Observer staff.

One Response to REPORT: Feds Should Use Limited Resources to Maintain Existing Lands

  1. Bob Terry
    November 7, 2013 at 11:21 am

    I am sorry Crown Jewels …That’s why Clinton wanted to give Yellowstone to the UN now the Alamo has a Democrat Mayor in San Antonio who wants to turn it over to the UN as well … National Parks service over zealous …really … The National Parks Service overstepped its authority … to the point of trying to close things the Government didn’t own or operate.. Another narrative …that Government cannot even get out of its own way … But Hey Government Our doctor lawyer and chief…your insurance agent … They can’t manage themselves yet we turn our Liberties over to them …come on People … They work for you NOT WE FOR THEM !! I enjoyed Rocky Mountain National Park as a child ..Mt Evans…etc …great places …But with this type of Control and Dictation ….National Parks I won’t support you … you pooped yerself …Clean yerself up … Oh by the way Dead Forests that’s a first place to start …


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Complete Colorado
Colorado Peak Politics - Sometimes Unruly. Always Conservative.

Visitor Poll

Should illegal immigrant kids flooding the border be housed in Colorado?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

The Colorado Observer