Debate Over Rural Payments Intensifies

January 24, 2014
TIPTON: “It’s disappointing that funding for PILT was conspicuously absent … despite repeated pleas from Western members”

TIPTON: “It’s disappointing that funding for PILT was conspicuously absent … despite repeated pleas from Western members”

WASHINGTON – Colorado’s Democratic Senators who voted for a budget that excluded $32 million for the state’s rural areas are also backing a deal to instead attach the money as a rider to the controversial and expensive Farm Bill.

The payment-in-lieu-taxes, or PILT funding ran out in December leaving thousands of counties nationwide struggling to make up for the total $400 million to pay for emergency services and education.

Meanwhile, the Farm Bill has languished for two years in battles over federal subsidies and food stamp funding.

By tying it to PILT money, critics say Western Republicans would essentially be blackmailed into supporting the Farm Bill.

Sens. Michael Bennet and Mark Udall are part of a mostly Democratic coalition who voted in favor of the budget without PILT dollars, then on the same day signed a letter urging congressional leaders to attach the funding to the Farm Bill.

“They’ve created another crisis, created uncertainty for political reasons,” said a Republican Senate staffer familiar with the funding switch.

“We saw it coming from a mile away when they did not put (PILT) in the budget bill,” the staffer said. “By keeping PILT out of the budget, leadership set up Western Republicans to vote for the Farm Bill.”

“It’s total extortion,” the staffer added.

More than $76 billion was spent last year for the food stamps program, which allows participation for anyone receiving $1 in heating assistance, and more than 47 million Americans are now enrolled.

The Farm Bill would also include what some critics describe as “Soviet-style” price supports for dairy products they fear would drive up the price of milk.

“They’re going to lard up the farm bill and we’re going to get rolled,” the staffer said. “It’s total Washington nonsense.”

Colorado House Republicans voted against the $1.1 trillion budget and spending measure that did not contain the PILT money, while Colorado’s House Democrats voted in favor of the bill.

“It’s disappointing that funding for PILT was conspicuously absent … despite repeated pleas from Western members to renew the vital program,” Tipton said in a statement after the vote.

The PILT funding goes to nearly 2,000 counties that lose out on property taxes needed for schools and law enforcement because they are surrounded by significant acreages of public land operated by the federal government, such as national forests.

About 70 percent of the Western Slope is public land.

“Money ran out in December, and if not funded soon communities will be forced to make significant cuts,” the staffer said. “Counties are freaking out.”

Interestingly, the letter from Bennet and Udall asking Farm Bill negotiators to attach PILT funding to their measure was also signed by Democratic Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, who chairs the Senate Budget Committee and had the authority to fund PILT in the spending bill.

“Counties across the country, particularly those containing significant federal landholdings, rely on PILT funds as sizeable percentages of their budgets,” the senators’ letter said.

“Unfortunately the FY 2014 Omnibus spending bill did not include resources for this vital program,” the letter said.

Comments made by visitors are not representative of The Colorado Observer staff.

One Response to Debate Over Rural Payments Intensifies

  1. PowerOfChoice
    January 25, 2014 at 5:04 pm

    It is only nonsense if Legislators allow themselves to be rolled or extorted. PILT needs to be in a Separate Bill funded for a long period of time. It is only fair that the Federal government pay for services that their Federal property receives.

    It should NOT be in the Farm Bill. If it is added to the Farm Bill which is already too full of garbage it will be subjected periodically to the petty bickering and would be irresponsible of legislators. The Farm Bill should be eliminated and any items should stand alone in their own separate bills only if desperately needed and considering we need to reduce our 17+ Trillion dollar deficit. It is time to end the back scratching pork. The following article is a good example of the back scratching trash in the Farm Bill:


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Complete Colorado
Colorado Peak Politics - Sometimes Unruly. Always Conservative.

Visitor Poll

Should illegal immigrant kids flooding the border be housed in Colorado?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

The Colorado Observer