Obama EPA Rules Target Wood Burning Stoves

January 9, 2014
The EPA maintains that their proposal would reduce particle emissions, but industry leaders contend the science behind the plan is faulty

The EPA proposal targets particle emissions, but industry leaders contend the science behind the plan is faulty

WASHINGTON — Colorado has been a leader in reducing air pollution caused by wood burning stoves, but new rules proposed by the Environmental Protection Agency threatens to roll back those advancements, critics say.

The regulations are scheduled to take effect in 2015 and would affect home woodstoves, wood-fired heaters, wood-pellet stoves, fireplace inserts and masonry heaters, as well as forced air wood furnaces manufactured after that date.

The EPA maintains that their proposal to mandate different design elements would reduce particle emissions in new stoves, but industry leaders contend the science behind the plan is faulty, and while there would be no significant reduction in pollution the cost of manufacturing the stoves would increase.

And. raising prices would defeat the previous goal to reduce air pollution by convincing the millions of consumers still using stoves manufactured before any air standards were mandated to trade those in for pollution reducing products already on the market.

The bulk of wood stoves in use, about six million, predate the certification process, while less than 100,000 new or replacement stoves are sold every year, said John Crouch, director of public affairs for the Hearth, Patio and Barbecue Association.

“This regulation nibbles on the edge of the woodstove issue,” Crouch said.

The association does not oppose revising the regulations that were written in 1988.

“That needs to be updated and fixed,” Crouch said.

But manufacturers are concerned the new rules will be costly and take a heavy toll on small businesses, while producing a new stove that is only marginally different.

“In Vail and Telluride, people are used to wood heat, changing out to a cleaner stove is much more important,” Crouch said.

“If the new stoves cost quite a bit more, is that consumer more, or less likely to change it out?” Crouch asked.

“This is the struggle we have,” Crouch said.

Manufacturers that challenge the new regulations will likely get support from some lawmakers on Capitol Hill, who are already challenging the EPA’s use of questionable science to create contentious new rules.

The EPA announced the proposed stove rules last week, but in November, Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky questioned EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy during a Science Committee hearing about their plans.

Massie suggested that the Obama administration wants consumers to rely on government checks to pay heating bills, rather than to continue to allow cost savings by using wood burning stoves.

“First the administration went after coal, now it’s coming after wood heat,” Massie said.

“As the price of coal fired electricity goes up due to the president’s promise to bankrupt the coal industry, wood heat is a viable alternative for some individuals who are willing to split wood instead of watching TV,” Massie said.

Nearly 12 million homes nationwide are heated by wood, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

“Federal regulation of wood burning is misguided,” Massie said.

The decision to create the new rules was prompted in part by lawsuits from environmental groups, which hailed the announcement.

The EPA says smoke from woodstoves creates health problems, including heart attacks, asthma attacks and strokes.

The agency will accept public comments on the proposal for three months, with only one public hearing scheduled for next month in Boston.

Comments made by visitors are not representative of The Colorado Observer staff.

5 Responses to Obama EPA Rules Target Wood Burning Stoves

  1. January 9, 2014 at 9:48 pm

    I think wood burning stoves are very useful. So, Gov. should understand the benefits of wood burning stoves.

  2. Vic
    February 25, 2014 at 2:55 am

    What is the Government thinking. The elect grid goes down all the time!! And people need heat and a way to cook. Can we get the government for killing people???? Wood burning stoves, should be under the Grandfather law. They have been around longer than most of us.

  3. February 25, 2014 at 8:45 pm

    I believe that this EPA study is unproven. Since when does burning wood give people heart attacks? Of course if people eat at fast food restaurants and eat junk food all their lives then maybe smelling a lot of smoke may do that but we who live in the country, eating the food we grow (non GMO) are not a candidate for such heart attacks. This is nothing but scare tactics,with the purpose of controlling us who live in the country. Please read the 10th Ammendment and note that the Federal government has to leave everything to the state and to the people that is not one of 18 jobs of the federal govt actually listed in the Constitution. But who reads that anymore. Most cannot even read the law, it is above their IQ!

  4. Denny
    March 17, 2014 at 12:47 pm

    What else can the government regulate for us? Regulating wood stoves seems like a drop in the bucket compared to the particle emissions released by the thousands and thousands of smoke stacks in the country and what about the forest fires that consume a million acres every year? There are some real particle emissions! Apparently this means wood burning fireplaces will be banned?

  5. T. Smorzaniuk
    October 1, 2014 at 9:36 am

    Wood burning emissions do not pollute the upper atmosphere. All particulates fall back to the ground. Go after the ones who are burning down rain forests. How does the government regulate volcanic eruptions, too? Let’s talk about pollutants starting with over paid bureaucrats who pay for their ‘clean pollution’. They are the biggest waste of energy in the world.


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Complete Colorado
Colorado Peak Politics - Sometimes Unruly. Always Conservative.

Visitor Poll

Should illegal immigrant kids flooding the border be housed in Colorado?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

The Colorado Observer