What’s Behind Salazar’s Conversion to Keystone?

February 25, 2014
By
Where was Ken Salazar’s approval when it really mattered?

Where was Ken Salazar’s approval when it really mattered?

Ken Salazar’s recent conversion from President Barack Obama’s liberal Interior secretary to a supporter of the Keystone XL pipeline and fracking for natural gas has heads scratching from Colorado to Washington, D.C.

The Democrat and former Colorado Senator resigned from his Interior post April 12, which means he is forbidden to lobby Congress or any federal government agency for one year.

Salazar was hired in June by the international law firm of WilmerHale to add Denver to its roster of more than a dozen offices in the U.S., Europe, and Asia. In addition to its numerous lobbying roles, the firm also advises companies in the energy sector.

As one Washington insider told The Colorado Observer, just because Salazar can’t work as a lobbyist, doesn’t mean he can’t deliver speeches or talk to reporters about issues that would benefit the law firm’s current clients, or act as an advertisement to recruit new clients.

When Salazar unleashed his comments earlier this month that the Keystone pipeline was a “win-win” project for U.S. energy and that fracking is a safe method to free oil and gas, it was during an energy conference in Houston, Texas, and directed toward an Associated Press reporter.

As far as we know, there were no congressmen, government bureaucrats, or any of his former employees from the Interior Department lurking about when the comments were made, so it doesn’t appear that any lobbying rules were broken.

However, the wide distribution of Salazar’s new and improved opinions was most certainly heard by his probably-soon-to-be-former-friends in the environmental lobby that called his comments a disservice to the cause, as well as decision-makers in Washington.

Some folks in the oil and gas industry are whispering that Salazar is now on the payroll of a major energy trade association, but when contacted by The Colorado Observer that organization issued a wobbly statement that neither confirmed nor denied their involvement.

Some media outlets have suggested that Salazar is simply promoting the causes of clients already on the WilmerHale roster.

A review of required lobbying disclosure forms filed with the U.S. Senate does show that WilmerHale lobbied on behalf of the Business Roundtable last year, an association of chief executive officers that promotes a sound and thriving economy, which has also endorsed the Keystone pipeline.

But the disclosure forms state that WilmerHale was only retained to lobby for the Business Roundtable on issues that relate to the pending Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement.

However, WilmerHale’s website provides a list of “representative clients” that includes Statoil, which has an operation in the Alberta oil sands – the region from which the Keystone pipeline would be moving oil from Canada and through the U.S.

Salazar insists that he has always been neutral on the Keystone pipeline construction that has been stalled by the Obama administration for five years, but his words suggest otherwise.

“My concerns about the Keystone pipeline are in line with the Obama administration’s position on the issue,” Salazar said in a 2012 statement.

“I feel that the president acted responsibly in rejecting the initial proposal on the grounds of environmental issues. Until the guidelines for this project are significantly altered, the pipeline should not be constructed because of the potential risks it poses to the well being of U.S. citizens,” Salazar said.

Maybe Salazar’s change of heart comes from the independence of being able to speak as a free man, unburdened by his role as President Obama’s key advisor on natural resources.

“We know that from everything we’ve seen, there’s not a single case where hydraulic fracking has created an environmental problem for anyone,” Salazar now tells the Associated Press. “We need to make sure that story is told.”

We certainly welcome Salazar’s new and improved views. We just wish Salazar had the courage to express those opinions when he was the Interior secretary, and the process began for new regulations that threatens to strangle the natural gas industry’s fracking process, and that he had intervened in the Keystone debate when his voice truly mattered.

Comments made by visitors are not representative of The Colorado Observer staff.

4 Responses to What’s Behind Salazar’s Conversion to Keystone?

  1. Shredder
    February 25, 2014 at 1:01 pm

    Salazar is for sale much like a prostitute.
    No morals and no vision.

    • disgusted
      February 28, 2014 at 5:01 pm

      PROFIT!

  2. Ruth SMith
    February 26, 2014 at 8:10 pm

    Any company that paid his law firm a big as_ retainer.

  3. PeterP
    March 12, 2014 at 2:33 pm

    “We know that from everything we’ve seen, there’s not a single case where hydraulic fracking has created an environmental problem for anyone,” Salazar now tells the Associated Press. “We need to make sure that story is told.”

    We shouldn’t be looking a gift-horse in the mouth. We should take this guy to every corner in the state and have him shout this one line from the roof tops. He should be at every anti-fracking government petition hearing the greens are forcing on our city and county governments. His voice should be the loudest in every anti-fracking meeting we could drag him to.

    Is this really how sausage is made? Yes, I believe it is.

Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Complete Colorado
Colorado Peak Politics - Sometimes Unruly. Always Conservative.

Visitor Poll

Should illegal immigrant kids flooding the border be housed in Colorado?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

The Colorado Observer